<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tejada Happiness Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oriolesthinktank.wordpress.com/2006/04/21/tejada-happiness-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oriolesthinktank.wordpress.com/2006/04/21/tejada-happiness-update/</link>
	<description>Orioles Coverage for the Information Age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 19:32:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bradley</title>
		<link>http://oriolesthinktank.wordpress.com/2006/04/21/tejada-happiness-update/#comment-489</link>
		<dc:creator>bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2006 21:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oriolesthinktank.wordpress.com/2006/04/21/tejada-happiness-update/#comment-489</guid>
		<description>i agree angels would have been a good match.  don;t know if it still makes sense w/o making a bunch of other moves, not that a bunch of other moves don&#039;t need to be made.

at what point do they cut their losses on chen...maybe move him to the pen?  i can definitely say that chen and lopez back to back is KILLING the bullpen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree angels would have been a good match.  don;t know if it still makes sense w/o making a bunch of other moves, not that a bunch of other moves don&#8217;t need to be made.</p>
<p>at what point do they cut their losses on chen&#8230;maybe move him to the pen?  i can definitely say that chen and lopez back to back is KILLING the bullpen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://oriolesthinktank.wordpress.com/2006/04/21/tejada-happiness-update/#comment-488</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 17:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oriolesthinktank.wordpress.com/2006/04/21/tejada-happiness-update/#comment-488</guid>
		<description>Zachary-

I happen to think that, as is, the O&#039;s are unlikely to compete throughout the entirety of Tejada&#039;s contract.  So why not roll the dice and try to acquire two or three decent-to-good young players for him.  Then, take the money you save on his contract and try to replace his offense wherever you can fit in a FA whenever you expect to contend.  

Kilbs-

I think we&#039;re on the same page on this one.  I happen to think trading Tejada &lt;i&gt;could&lt;/i&gt; be best for the franchise(if done right); him shooting his mouth off just gives the O&#039;s a good excuse to do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zachary-</p>
<p>I happen to think that, as is, the O&#8217;s are unlikely to compete throughout the entirety of Tejada&#8217;s contract.  So why not roll the dice and try to acquire two or three decent-to-good young players for him.  Then, take the money you save on his contract and try to replace his offense wherever you can fit in a FA whenever you expect to contend.  </p>
<p>Kilbs-</p>
<p>I think we&#8217;re on the same page on this one.  I happen to think trading Tejada <i>could</i> be best for the franchise(if done right); him shooting his mouth off just gives the O&#8217;s a good excuse to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kilbs</title>
		<link>http://oriolesthinktank.wordpress.com/2006/04/21/tejada-happiness-update/#comment-487</link>
		<dc:creator>Kilbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 06:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oriolesthinktank.wordpress.com/2006/04/21/tejada-happiness-update/#comment-487</guid>
		<description>I think the FO has to be realistic in answering this question: Can the Orioles really contend for a ring in the next two years?  If they can, then it makes sense to keep Tejada.  If they cannot, they I think you ask for a king&#039;s ransom in the off-season when the FA market is slim.  Hopefully that will make it a seller&#039;s market, but I&#039;ve been completely wrong in that regard in the past.

I think you try to acquire two top infield prospects for Tejada.  There are some teams that match up, notably the Angels.  I really wonder what offers Flanny received for Tejada this off-season.  I would trade him not because of what he said, but rather his overall value to the team in the long term.  Also, the fact that he didn&#039;t go to Elrod&#039;s funeral and he said those things during the whole thing really spoke ill of his character, but again, I trade him for the long term interest of the franchise, not because he shot his mouth off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the FO has to be realistic in answering this question: Can the Orioles really contend for a ring in the next two years?  If they can, then it makes sense to keep Tejada.  If they cannot, they I think you ask for a king&#8217;s ransom in the off-season when the FA market is slim.  Hopefully that will make it a seller&#8217;s market, but I&#8217;ve been completely wrong in that regard in the past.</p>
<p>I think you try to acquire two top infield prospects for Tejada.  There are some teams that match up, notably the Angels.  I really wonder what offers Flanny received for Tejada this off-season.  I would trade him not because of what he said, but rather his overall value to the team in the long term.  Also, the fact that he didn&#8217;t go to Elrod&#8217;s funeral and he said those things during the whole thing really spoke ill of his character, but again, I trade him for the long term interest of the franchise, not because he shot his mouth off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary</title>
		<link>http://oriolesthinktank.wordpress.com/2006/04/21/tejada-happiness-update/#comment-486</link>
		<dc:creator>Zachary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 23:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oriolesthinktank.wordpress.com/2006/04/21/tejada-happiness-update/#comment-486</guid>
		<description>Two things.

1) I don&#039;t think the O&#039;s should move Tejada in July. There is no one remotely in thepipeline to play shortstop, and buying a mediocre FA will not help this team.

2) Apparently Tejada isn&#039;t &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt; happy; he just jogged on his way to first again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two things.</p>
<p>1) I don&#8217;t think the O&#8217;s should move Tejada in July. There is no one remotely in thepipeline to play shortstop, and buying a mediocre FA will not help this team.</p>
<p>2) Apparently Tejada isn&#8217;t <i>that</i> happy; he just jogged on his way to first again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://oriolesthinktank.wordpress.com/2006/04/21/tejada-happiness-update/#comment-485</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 21:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://oriolesthinktank.wordpress.com/2006/04/21/tejada-happiness-update/#comment-485</guid>
		<description>I forgot to add this-

I was on the road for the entirety of the ballgame yesterday.  Apparently the umpiring was less than ideal and Joe Angel had this to say:

&quot;I think I found the umpire&#039;s cell phone.  I can tell it&#039;s his because of all the missed calls on it.&quot;

I liked it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot to add this-</p>
<p>I was on the road for the entirety of the ballgame yesterday.  Apparently the umpiring was less than ideal and Joe Angel had this to say:</p>
<p>&#8220;I think I found the umpire&#8217;s cell phone.  I can tell it&#8217;s his because of all the missed calls on it.&#8221;</p>
<p>I liked it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
